(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...6 views
Updated: January 7th, 2021 | Los Angeles | Lawyer List B | Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman P.C. | Catastrophic Injury, Class Actions, Product Liability, Wrongful Death,
The current rating on Bijan Esfandiari is
(No Ratings Yet)Loading...And receives 6 page views
Address: 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, 17th Floor, los-angeles, CA, 90024
Law Firm: Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C.
Phone: 310-694-5913
Fax: 310-820-7444
Email:
Website: http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com
| Title | Partner |
| First Year of Call | |
| Areas of Practice | Wrongful Death, Catastrophic Injury, Class Actions, Product Liability |
| Description | Bijan Esfandiari is a pharmaceutical product liability litigation attorney and partner at Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman in Los Angeles. He has successfully represented clients in state and federal courts across the nation at both the trial and appellate level in wrongful death and catastrophic personal injury cases.Bijan has had the privilege of participating in cases that have shaped and developed the law for the benefit of injured victims and consumers of pharmaceutical products. In one such case, the Court agreed with his arguments and, in an issue of first impression, held that drug manufacturers owe an affirmative duty to warn regarding risks associated with children’s off-label use. Bijan’s published cases have also exposed reprehensible corporate conduct. For example, a federal court in Pennsylvania noted that internal documents suggest that Defendant acted with a wanton and willful disregard for the safety of its consumers, and thus allowed Bijan’s clients to proceed with their punitive damages claims.He has also been at the forefront of the preemption battle and has successfully argued against preemption (drug/device manufacturer immunity) in numerous cases. Most recently, in 2014, Bijan successfully briefed and argued the first and only medical device preemption case to be heard by Maryland Court of Special Appeals, wherein in an issue of first impression, the three judge panel unanimously agreed with Bijan’s arguments that plaintiff’s claims were not preempted and held that plaintiff could proceed with his claims against the medical device manufacturer. McCormick v. Medtronic, Inc., 219 Md. App.485, 101 A.3d 467, 474 (2014) (We shall hold that federal law does not expressly or impliedly preempt the plaintiffs’ claims concerning misrepresentations or express warranties that the manufacturer may have made in voluntary communications with the public or with members of the medical profession.).Similarly, Bijan successfully briefed and argued the first drug preemption case to ever be heard by the United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal in Chicago, Illinois. In the landmark decision, the three judge panel of the Seventh Circuit unanimously agreed with Bijan’s arguments and held that plaintiffs’ claims against the drug manufacturer were not preempted by federal law. Mason v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.3d. 387 (7th Cir. 2010). The significance of these landmark rulings is they ensure that drug and medical device companies who engage in deceptive or impermissible conduct are not entitled to immunity (preemption) and must be held accountable for monetary damages in a court of law for any injuries that they or their products cause to consumers.In addition to the previously mentioned appellate decisions, Bijan has likewise successfully opposed preemption in numerous other state and federal trial courts, including Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.Supp.2d 1225 (S.D.Ind. 2008); Knipe v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 583 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa 2008); Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 639 F.Supp.2d 948 (E.D.Wis. 2009); Dorsett v. Sandoz, Inc., 699 F.Supp.2d 1142 (C.D.Cal. 2010); and Cabana v. Stryker Biotech LLC, 2012 WL 3876245 (Cal.Super.Ct., Aug. 20, 2012). Bijan also co-authored amicus briefs in support of the respondents in the Supreme Court’s landmark cases Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S.Ct. 1187 (2009) and Pliva v. Mensing, 131 S.Ct. 2567 (2011).Bijan has written numerous articles, including Complete Tort Immunity For Drug Manufacturers Is Bad For The Public Health, published in Mealey’sâ„¢ Litigation Report, Preemption’s Requiem in the Wake of Wyeth v. Levine, Mealey’sâ„¢ Emerging Drugs & Devices and Levine To Mensing A Journey From The Sublime To The Ridiculous, Mealey’sâ„¢ Emerging Drugs & Devices. Most recently, he co-wrote Challenging Medical Ghostwriting in US Courts, published in PLoS Medicine. |
National plaintiffs’ law firm representing whistleblowers and victims of TBI, aviation, bus, structure, train, trucking accidents, and defective products.Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman is recognized as a preeminent plaintiff firm that handles serious personal injury, traumatic brain injury and wrongful death lawsuits across the nation stemming from commercial transportation accidents and defective pharmaceutical products. We also repres…
Garvin Law PLLC
David P. Cherundolo
Strout & Payson P.A.
Eric M. Martin Attorney
Patrick H. Tate P.A.
The Ted Kanner Law Office
Conliffe Sandmann & Sullivan
John R. Hakanson
Keller Law Office
Jones & Swanson
Ogawa Lau Nakamura & Jew Attorneys At Law
Robert J. Och
Humbarger Zebell & Bieberich P.C.
Petersen & Lefkofsky P.C.
Cicchetti Tansley & McGrath LLP
Alfred F. Zachry P.C.
