(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...15 views
Updated: March 17th, 2021 | New York City | Lawyer List K | Ekblom & Partners LLP | General, Health Care, Labor Law,
The current rating on Kim A. Carnesi is
(No Ratings Yet)Loading...And receives 15 page views
Address: 850 Third Avenue, 21st Floor, new-york, NY, 10022
Law Firm: Ekblom & Partners, LLP
Phone: 646-817-8413
Fax: 646-677-6001
Email:
Website: https://www.ekblommedmallaw.com/
| Title | Partner |
| First Year of Call | |
| Areas of Practice | General, Health Care, Labor Law |
| Description | Kim Carnesi has been an advocate for medical professionals throughout the Tri-State for twenty years. Her advocacy extends to all areas of healthcare provider business. She also has experience in representing insurance companies in third party practice and indemnification proceedings. Ms. Carnesi’s efforts have led to dozens of defense verdicts and dismissals by trial and by motion. Ms. Carnesi’s practice focuses on medical malpractice, health care law and general liability defense. Ms. Carnesi also has extensive experience in appellate practice and has successfully argued numerous cases before the Appellate Division. Several of her reported cases are listed below. Ms. Carnesi lives with her husband and two children in New Jersey. Representative Matters Roca v. ___, 51 A.D.3d 757 (2008)(whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies and whether defendant physician is entitled to psychiatric records of plaintiff) DiGiaro v. ___, 41 A.D.3d 764 (2007)(whether physician departed from standard of care and whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies) Rodriguez v. ___, 29 A.D.3d 885 (2006)(whether attending physician, not notified of patient’s status, is responsible for malpractice of resident) Etienne v. ___, 295 A.D.2d 559 (2002)(whether attending physician is responsible for actions of resident where attending was not involved in care and mistakenly signed record) Monello v. ___, 281 A.D.2d 463 (2001)(whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies) Carvano v. ___, 270 A.D.2d 222 (2000)(whether out of possession landlord is responsible for injuries related to snow and ice removal) Murdocca v. ___, 265 A.D.2d 537 (1999)(whether the plaintiff’s failure to provide discovery warrants dismissal) Schenk v. ___, 266 A.D.2d 199 (1999)(whether defendant physicians are entitled to psychiatric examination of plaintiff) Palla v. ___, 248 A.D.2d 603 (1998)(whether venue is proper) Legal Experience Partner, Ekblom & Partners, LLP, New York, New York LeClairRyan, Newark, New Jersey Amabile & Erman, Staten Island, New York Professional Memberships New York State Bar Association American Bar Association Union County Bar Association |
EKBLOM & PARTNERS, LLP is a litigation boutique that zealously advocates on behalf of client businesses and professionals. Our practice is focused on representing clients in industries and professions that require medical and technical knowledge with experienced state and federal discovery and trial litigation skills. Our clients include public corporations, medical centers, hospitals, surgeons, ambulatory centers, sports venues, directors and…
David P. Cherundolo
Strout & Payson P.A.
Eric M. Martin Attorney
Patrick H. Tate P.A.
The Ted Kanner Law Office
Conliffe Sandmann & Sullivan
John R. Hakanson
Hoeppner Wagner & Evans LLP
Law Office of Douglas S. Pewitt
Murphy Hesse Toomey & Lehane LLP
Farrar Holliman Medley & Butler
Ogawa Lau Nakamura & Jew Attorneys At Law
Thomas Michael Renyer
Law Offices of Paul S. Dannenberg
Mostoller Stulberg Whitfield & Allen
Spencer & Spencer P.A.
